Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5
Results 41 to 48 of 48

Thread: The church and homosexuality

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Newport, South Wales
    Posts
    6,708
    Thanks
    800
    Thanked 713 Times in 599 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Barry View Post
    If DaveUK was still on the forum, he would be having some input here. He said that when he was studying theology, nobody believed the Bible.
    I'd forgotten him.

    And I think DaveUK might have had a point

    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...s-1392030.html
    --
    "The Inland Revenue is not slow, and quite rightly, to take every advantage which is open to it under the Taxing Statutes for the purposes of depleting the taxpayer's pocket. And the taxpayer is in like manner entitled to be astute to prevent, so far as he honestly can, the depletion of his means by the Inland Revenue"

    Lord Clyde: "Ayrshire Pullman Motor Services V Inland Revenue, 1929"

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to johnofgwent For This Useful Post:

    Barry (07-01-2017)

  3. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    405
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
    I've been doing some research on these homosexuals in the church. They have broken the rules, as per the agreement set out in the Lambeth 98 conference. Now an organisation called GAFCON, set up to deal with these sinners, has published a list of them, and what they have done wrong. Some complain they now get hate mail. Well they should have thought about it a bit harder at the time, and either packed their sinning in or resign from the church. They did neither, but took advantage of the lax disciplinary procedures in the church. Normally the church doesn't even need these procedures, but as it is now they are under attack by politicians, of whom many are homosexual or at least don't see anything wrong with it, and wish to order the church around, dictating what it is allowed to believe.
    Love Resurrection

  4. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Pixels on your screen
    Posts
    5,165
    Thanks
    591
    Thanked 565 Times in 415 Posts
    Baron, the CoE have shown no discernment of scripture in today's decision. They are simply moving in line with secular thought.
    We will end up with a C of E which is very split on this issue. Peter Tatchell must be very pleased with his efforts to divide the church on this issue.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38982013
    A new report will be drafted.

  5. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Pixels on your screen
    Posts
    5,165
    Thanks
    591
    Thanked 565 Times in 415 Posts
    Oh dear, one Bishop was confused about which way he was voting!
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38994125
    You can't get the staff...

  6. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    London N16
    Posts
    2,008
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 190 Times in 158 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Barry View Post
    Oh dear, one Bishop was confused about which way he was voting!
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38994125
    You can't get the staff...
    Not the first bishop to find his staff resting in the wrong niche, I'm thinking...
    The poster reserves the right to amend or completely change any opinions he has posted at any time meanwhile, still waiting for that whip hand...

  7. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    181
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Politicians interfering in religion is ridiculous. Because if what the bible, or any religious book is true, then we shall all be judged when we die.

    The devil must be one hell of a busy man.

  8. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    934
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
    I do not and have never associated the church with anti homosexuality.

    It is my firm belief that over the centuries, the cloisters have provided refuge for countless gays and indeed homosexuality amongst the clergy has been commonplace through out my life.


    I think the key problem for the Anglican diocese is that so many of it's adherents are African. And typically they hate homo's. Kill them.
    So the church cannot openly promote homosexuality because for most of it's flock, that is an abhorrence. They would simply leave the diocese and form their own religion and then carry on publicly executing gays. In the end the church has more sensibilities to worry about than just the people of this island.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Baff For This Useful Post:

    BryanLuc (17-02-2017)

  10. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    405
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
    Two of the three houses passed it, but it failed at the House of Clergy (100 votes to 93). That's very close, so redrafting it after seeing what they are worried about should do it. Note the House of Clergy consists of the miscellaneous non-bishop clergy, which includes those from universities apparently. The culture in a typical university is very leftwing and pro-homosexuals, feminists, Islamic extremists and so on. This is probably why it failed, but Gafcon are doing a great job.

    This is Dr Mike Ovey, who was the principle of a London theological college before he died last month (very sad), but he has put across some very interesting arguments.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbiPzVO0pZI

    He also spoke at Gafcon about cheap grace. Gafcon considered it a model argument. Anyhow he is talking to Cambridge students in the link. It's great to see Cambridge give the man an opportunity to speak.
    Love Resurrection

Similar Threads

  1. Church 'has duty to debate politics'
    By stevectaylor in forum Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17-02-2015, 02:08 PM
  2. Gay marriage to be illegal in the Church of England
    By Bright Young Thing in forum Religion, Faith and Spirituality
    Replies: 92
    Last Post: 14-11-2013, 04:21 PM
  3. Ban On Male Homosexual Blood Donors Set To Be Lifted
    By Nicholas in forum United Kingdom Politics & Political Forum
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 11-09-2011, 09:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •