View RSS Feed

coalition

The still suspect swindler LaGarde, who would hardly qualify for a licence to run a Bank, and yet Chairs the IMFapplauds Osbornes incoherent financial policies.

Rate this Entry
[QUOTE=coalition;1120605]IMF chief Christine Lagarde charged with 'negligence' in £318m French political corruption case;

[URL]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2735489/IMF-chief-Christine-Lagarde-investigated-French-court-alleged-role-political-fraud-case.html[/URL]
And yet....
Austerity has been an even bigger disaster than we thought:
There might be a worse idea than cutting spending during a depression, but I doubt it.
The fundamental economic question of the last five years has been a simple one: how much does stimulus work? The answer, according to a new paper by [URL="http://www.nber.org/papers/w20533.pdf"]Daniel Riera-Crichton, Carlos Vegh, and Guillermo Vuletin[/URL], is much more than we previously thought. And that means austerity has also hurt more than we thought — so much so that it might even be self-defeating.
That's right: cutting spending in a slump might actually make debt problems worse.

It's all about the fiscal multiplier. Stimulus, you see, is measured by how much one dollar of government spending increases GDP. But in a normal economy, it doesn't. That's because the Federal Reserve has its inflation target that it's determined to hit (or at least not overshoot). Government spending, though, can flood the economy with money, raising prices in the process. So the Fed, in turn, would either raise rates to offset this spending it doesn't want, or wouldn't cut rates like it otherwise would have.

Either way, the Fed's actions would keep the economy from being any bigger with more government spending than it would be without it.
[URL]http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/10/07/austerity-has-been-an-even-bigger-disaster-than-we-thought/[/URL]

I guess she is still swindling.[/QUOTE]
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments